Solri's lamentable tendency toward physical violence
Saturday, December 7th, 2002 04:20 amWhenever I read Internet posts by wannabe Nietzscheans, neo-Nazis, Ayn Rand fetishists, the two people who voted for George Bush and so on about how the weak are a drain on the strong, free competition is the only way forward, aid to developing countries is immoral, and in general "I'm good and deserve to survive because I have good genes and a high credit rating", I just want to say -
"OK, if you're so fit to survive, let's test it. I bet your kneecaps break as easily as any of those welfare bums'."
"OK, if you're so fit to survive, let's test it. I bet your kneecaps break as easily as any of those welfare bums'."
no subject
Date: 2002-12-07 08:21 am (UTC)I'm glad I found your journal, and your posts in Philosophy have been appreciated.
The trick, of course, is how to explain the notion of compassion as an positive evolutionary habit, or even an individually helpful adaption. Forgive my snide contempt, but I try to console myself that the wannabe Nietzschean's and Randroids will give up their noise when they grow up and try to get a) a job and b) laid.
no subject
Date: 2002-12-07 09:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-12-07 03:19 pm (UTC)I've seen info on this somewhere... beyond just the usual Buddhists' explanations.
...the wannabe Nietzschean's and Randroids will give up their noise when they grow up and try to get a) a job and b) laid.
Ha ha ha! *L* I don't doubt one bit that's probably true. Potential employers don't give a rat's ass about someone's personal philosophy; and dry, soulless beliefs aren't exactly sexy, are they? :)
no subject
Date: 2002-12-07 04:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-12-07 05:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-12-07 05:56 pm (UTC)BTW, have you read that book Wittgenstein's Poker? Great fun.
There again, the fact that I have just described a book about a debate between two Austrian philosophers as "great fun" would probably make most people who saw me at a party feel an irresistible urge to hurry off to the kitchen and sample the cheese dips.
no subject
Date: 2002-12-07 06:37 pm (UTC)Only the ones not interested in philosophy. :)
no subject
Date: 2002-12-07 05:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-12-07 06:35 pm (UTC)Ken Wilber has put together the most compelling version of the "compassion as evolution" argument that I've seen, but he draws from a large number of disciplines.
I've heard of Ken Wilber; haven't read anything by him yet. One thing that stuck in my mind is from when I watched the miniseries documentary Rome, Power & Glory. Apparently, compassion was in terribly short order and it was thought to be anti-Roman to show sympathy; however, there didn't seem to be much humor either. Whether it's hard-wired into us makes you ask what happened to it way back then, or was it just strongly supressed?
Can you imagine a world without any compassion or empathy?? *shudder*
no subject
Date: 2002-12-07 07:04 pm (UTC)They did have a sense of humour, though - look at Juvenal or Ovid.
no subject
Date: 2002-12-07 07:22 pm (UTC)I have a translated book on Marcus Aurelius titled "Meditations." He did seem to be much 'softer' than other emperors. He also said he thought there was a strong distinction between religion and philosophy... thought religion was mostly ceremonial and for the masses (to be handled by the clergy) and philosophy limited to those dedicated to higher intellectual thoughts and 'asking questions,' and that passage interests me greatly!
I'm sure SOME must have had a sense of humor, but that one documentary noted that humor in general was rather frowned upon. Maybe they didn't anyone laughing when someone got torn to pieces in the Colosseum!
no subject
Date: 2002-12-08 11:52 am (UTC)I'll have to dig through my neurophsych bookmarks, but if memory serves me, high environmental lead levels have been correlated with learning impairments at a very early age. It makes sense to me that one of the developmental processes that could be damaged is self/other differentation, and therefore a neurochemical surpresson of empathy/compassion. I could well be swinging at the bats there, though.
Thank you both for the ongoing discussion.
no subject
Date: 2002-12-07 09:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-12-07 03:13 pm (UTC)You're talking about my two cousins, the Republicans-or-Death organizers. ;) (just kidding!)
There are times I feel like breaking people's kneecaps, too, but I figure letting people upset me is just going to be bad for MY health in the long run, and I'm certainly not going to give anybody THAT kind of power over me, heh heh. :Þ But I would sometimes like to slingshot a sharp rock into the windshields of the idiots who run red traffic lights!
I checked your userinfo. My goodness, someone in LJ is older than I am??? ;)
no subject
Date: 2002-12-07 04:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-12-10 07:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-12-10 07:41 am (UTC)Now of course I no longer identify as an anarchist. I call myself a "libertarian socialist", which means "wussy wannabe-anarchist liberal".
Speaking of libertarian socialists, I here Chomsky is coming to Turkey again soon. Bet he only comes to Istanbul, though.