Brown-skinned hobbits?

Thursday, June 8th, 2006 08:32 am
robinturner: (Default)
[personal profile] robinturner
Dipping into Patrick Curry’s Defending Middle Earth, I came across the parenthetical comment “Incidentally, the hobbits appear to be brown-skinned, not white.” This is interesting, not just because, if true, it would be one important detail that Peter Jackson (and pretty much everybody else) got wrong, but also because it would add an interesting twist to the corny “Was Tolkien racist?” arguments.

Ever since I first listened to The Hobbit as a bed-time story, I’d assumed that hobbits were white. In fact, I assumed this of all the races of Middle Earth who weren’t specifically described otherwise, with the exception of the people of Gondor, who I thought of as olive-skinned, since I vaguely associated them with Romans (an association which Tolkien himself may also have made, though in his case Minas Tirith might well have been the Rome of the popes rather than the Caesars). This is only natural, since (a) I am white, and thus tend unthinkingly to picture characters I identify with as looking rather like myself, and (b) Middle Earth, as Tolkien repeatedly pointed out, is based on the mythology of North-Western Europe. While The Lord of the Rings has achieved international popularity, it is no more an attempt to create a universal myth than was the Kalevala or Journey to the West.

So, if Tolkien really did conceive of his hobbits as brown rather than white, he must have had a reason. Hobbits aren’t just European, they are very, very English: the Shire is famous as an affectionate parody of rural England. Why, then, give them brown skins? It is just about conceivable that Tolkien was deliberately trying to avoid association with the perversion of “Nordic” mythology by the likes of “that ruddy ignoramus” Adolf Hitler. But a more plausible reason might be that he was not trying to make the hobbits less “Nordic” (scare-quotes because Tolkien himself hated the term) but to make them more rural. English folklore is replete with descriptions of country folk as “brown”—think, for example, of the folk song “Bonny Brown Girl”. And of course, this would place hobbits outside the aristocratic aura that emanates from all elves and most humans in the story.

Anyway, I would be grateful if any Tolkien buffs out there could provide me with a textual reference for hobbit skins.

Date: 2006-06-08 10:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vret.livejournal.com
I could probably get you Tom Shippey's email address if you want. I'm sure one of our mutual friends will have it. He'll have forgotten you by now, so it should be safe enough ;-)

Incidentally, I did quite a double take when I went into Borders a couple of years ago and saw "Author of the Century - Tom Shippey" on one of the shelves. Then I realised it wasn't his autobiography after all.

Date: 2006-06-08 11:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] solri.livejournal.com
Tom's address would be nice to have, and would be especially useful if and when the Tolkien course I'm planning starts.

I'm reading that book at the moment - it's pretty good. It intrigues me that Tom is such a Tolkien fan, given his rather low opinion of fantasy in general.

Date: 2006-06-08 12:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vret.livejournal.com
I would guess that LOTR was the first fantasy he read, there wasn't so much around when he was a lad, and not much since has had the effect on him that that did, which makes it all very disappointing.

I don't think there is much fantasy around with the kind of depth that is in Tolkien. For most of us it's just a big fantasy that you can get lost in with lots of details that you don't really bother following (and that many people find make it very hard going), but those details do stand up to very close academic study.

Date: 2006-06-09 06:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] solri.livejournal.com
True. There's also the fact that my encounter with Tom Shippey was in a course he taught on science fiction, in which he was at pains to demarcate SF as a "literature of ideas" from mere space opera or fantasy. He usually reserved his real venom, though, for the nineteenth-century novel, describing Jane Austen's work as "boring people doing boring things." This relates to the sectarian divide in English deparmtnets between the medievalists and the purveyors of "modern" literature (meaning anything after 1700). The former tend to like Tolkien, and the latter to dismiss him, though there are notable exceptions, such as that arch-modernist W.H. Auden, who was one of Tolkien's staunchest defenders.

Date: 2006-06-09 06:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] solri.livejournal.com
Oops, I temporarily forgot that Auden was strongly influenced by Anglo-Saxon verse, so that would make him a natural Tolkien-defender.

TSnUyFpJIPav

Date: 2007-05-19 05:54 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Good site, thanks! APosterTest

Profile

robinturner: (Default)
Robin Turner

June 2014

M T W T F S S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425 26272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags