More linguistic nit-picking
Tuesday, September 14th, 2004 10:36 pmI ask rhetorically, and in my most curmudgeonly voice: "Whatever happened to place structure?"
Those readers who have better things to do with their lives than study semantics may well ask (non-rhetorically) "WTF is a place structure?"
Well boys and girls, place structure is what happens when you use any verb (well any predicate, to be precise). If I say "Fred gave John a chihuahua", the place structure of "give" tells us that it was John, not Fred, who received the dog, and that the Fifi wasn't giving anyone anything. So what would we expect in the following sentence from the website of Anthony Robbins?
Wrong. Apparently Mr Robbins was not going around asking for the opinions of various dignitaries (plus the entire army and marine corps*). Rather, it was he who was giving them advice. It seems that "consult" is now a two-way verb, in that it can mean either "a sought the opnion of b" or "the opinion of a was sought by b." The only other verb that comes to mind that has this property is the Cheney word.
* I thought the U.S. Marines were part of the U.S. Army, but then my knowledge of this organisation comes mainly from G.I. Jane, so I could well be wrong.
Those readers who have better things to do with their lives than study semantics may well ask (non-rhetorically) "WTF is a place structure?"
Well boys and girls, place structure is what happens when you use any verb (well any predicate, to be precise). If I say "Fred gave John a chihuahua", the place structure of "give" tells us that it was John, not Fred, who received the dog, and that the Fifi wasn't giving anyone anything. So what would we expect in the following sentence from the website of Anthony Robbins?
He has consulted members of two royal families, U.S. Congressmen, the U.S. Army, the U.S. Marines and three Presidents of the United States.
Wrong. Apparently Mr Robbins was not going around asking for the opinions of various dignitaries (plus the entire army and marine corps*). Rather, it was he who was giving them advice. It seems that "consult" is now a two-way verb, in that it can mean either "a sought the opnion of b" or "the opinion of a was sought by b." The only other verb that comes to mind that has this property is the Cheney word.
* I thought the U.S. Marines were part of the U.S. Army, but then my knowledge of this organisation comes mainly from G.I. Jane, so I could well be wrong.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-14 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-14 03:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-14 03:14 pm (UTC)Interestingly, the Turkish for the Cheney verb is also, as a noun, his first name. Even more interestingly, it can be used with a reciprocal suffix, so you could say "Ahmet and Ayşe were Dicking each other."
no subject
Date: 2004-09-14 04:00 pm (UTC)I guess it would be a CONTAINER image schema, since I think of Cheneying as the action of penetrating.
Does Turkish "dick" come from an actual Turkish word, or is is an English borrowing? Because in my dialect, "Ahmet and Ayşe were Dicking each other" basically means what it would mean in Turkish. I don't know about your dialect, since y'all seem to say "Willy" instead of "Dick."
no subject
Date: 2004-09-15 01:23 am (UTC)I've never heard the phrase "dicking each other" (and you can't use "willy" as a verb).
no subject
Date: 2004-09-15 10:10 am (UTC)Actually, it's more commonly "He was dicking her," but people would probably understand you if you said "dicking each other."
cheney word
Date: 2004-09-15 10:56 am (UTC)Re: cheney word
Date: 2004-09-15 11:00 am (UTC)So how would you say this? I guess, "He was consultant to..." ?
Re: cheney word
Date: 2004-09-15 12:11 pm (UTC)Re: cheney word
Date: 2004-09-15 11:03 am (UTC)Hee.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-14 03:03 pm (UTC)(I have no particular affiliation with the Marines, I just think the line is funny.)
no subject
Date: 2004-09-14 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-14 03:03 pm (UTC)The film A Few Good Men (I've got a film for everything) provides some insights into their relationship, for instance that Marine defendants are prosecuted by marines but defended by sailors, and Jack Nicholson's generous allowance that "We need a navy; every once in a while the Marines need a ride and there they are". (not word-for-word)
Said movie would have been another good one for the Warriors theme ("This society has walls, and those walls must be guarded by men with guns"). Except that it's one of those where the Warriors in question never actually get to fight an enemy.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-14 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-14 08:31 pm (UTC)That's just wrong! We must put an end to this blasphemy at once, not matter how many lives are lost in the pursuit of our nobel cause.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-15 01:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-15 04:53 am (UTC)Of course, I was so upset about grammar that I didn't check my own in the previous comment.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-17 01:19 am (UTC)As library rep for the Navy department, I have to deal with the amphibious warfare course... I love my marines.