Whenever I hear someone talking about "a quantum leap", I get the urge to say "You mean something so small you need expensive laboratory equipment to detect it?"
"It is sometimes said that a phrase such as 'a quantum leap in technology' is inappropriate, because 'quantum' supposedly means 'small' in quantum mechanics, so a 'quantum leap' would be a 'small advance'. However, 'quantum' does not actually mean 'small' in quantum mechanics; it means 'indivisible' or 'all-at-once'. A quantum leap is an advance that happens all at once, rather than gradually over time. If advances are classified as either evolutionary or revolutionary, then a quantum leap would be the latter."
In my ENG 101 classes, I give students a list of common words in academic writing (http://www.vuw.ac.nz/lals/staff/averil-coxhead/awl/frequent.html), with a strong recommendation (backed up by a few quizzes) that they make sure they know them. One of these is, of course, "paradigm", and on a few occasions, I've had the following exchange in class:
ME: Can anyone tell me what a paradigm is? STUDENT: Paradigma. [The Turkish for "paradigm"] ME: Peki. "Paradigma" ne demek?" [OK. What does "paradigma" mean?] STUDENT: Ne biliğim. [I haven't a clue.] ME: Don't worry. No one really knows what a paradigm is.
The Oxford English Dictionary defines "paradigm" as "A pattern, exemplar, example," though it also allows metaphorical use, quoting a paper in Language: "As for the periods in between the quantum leaps, Kuhn contends that each period of normal science in the development of a scientific discipline corresponds to one and only one methodological framework or paradigm. In a nut-shell, paradigms are ‘universally recognized scientific achievements that for a time provide model problems and solutions to a community of practitioners’."
What has, I assume, happened is that, thanks largely to Kuhn, the meaning of "examplar" has given way to something like "theoretical framework" and hence to "Weltanschauung."
This is the way I always tended to interpret the word paradigm:
"A set of assumptions, concepts, values, and practices that constitutes a way of viewing reality for the community that shares them, especially in an intellectual discipline." (definition #3 at dictionary.com)
Some one, I think it might have been Mary Warnick, wrote a paper claiming that Kuhn used "paradigm" no less that 28 different ways in The Structure of Scientific Revolution.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-26 03:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-26 03:17 pm (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_leap
no subject
Date: 2004-06-26 03:23 pm (UTC)Depends whether we're discussing this in terms of vocab and perceived meanings, or scientific definitions.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-26 03:48 pm (UTC)In my ENG 101 classes, I give students a list of common words in academic writing (http://www.vuw.ac.nz/lals/staff/averil-coxhead/awl/frequent.html), with a strong recommendation (backed up by a few quizzes) that they make sure they know them. One of these is, of course, "paradigm", and on a few occasions, I've had the following exchange in class:
ME: Can anyone tell me what a paradigm is?
STUDENT: Paradigma. [The Turkish for "paradigm"]
ME: Peki. "Paradigma" ne demek?" [OK. What does "paradigma" mean?]
STUDENT: Ne biliğim. [I haven't a clue.]
ME: Don't worry. No one really knows what a paradigm is.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-26 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-26 04:09 pm (UTC)What has, I assume, happened is that, thanks largely to Kuhn, the meaning of "examplar" has given way to something like "theoretical framework" and hence to "Weltanschauung."
no subject
Date: 2004-06-26 08:06 pm (UTC)"A set of assumptions, concepts, values, and practices that constitutes a way of viewing reality for the community that shares them, especially in an intellectual discipline." (definition #3 at dictionary.com)
no subject
Date: 2004-06-27 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-26 10:20 pm (UTC)So what hope have the rest of us got?
no subject
Date: 2004-06-26 08:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-26 10:21 pm (UTC)