Postmodern fatigue
Friday, June 27th, 2003 01:46 amThe one drawback of doing this course on The Matrix is that I'm having to read a lot of postmodernist stuff. Well,
chr0me_kitten did warn me!
Question 1: Does the recent history of continental philosophy mirror Baudrillard's precession of simulacra?
Question 2: Are students who post essays on critical theory on the web genuinely bad writers, or are their shortcomings in spelling, punctuation and general clarity an attempt to avoid co-optation?
Question 1: Does the recent history of continental philosophy mirror Baudrillard's precession of simulacra?
Question 2: Are students who post essays on critical theory on the web genuinely bad writers, or are their shortcomings in spelling, punctuation and general clarity an attempt to avoid co-optation?
no subject
Date: 2003-06-27 05:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-27 06:25 am (UTC)The first film is certainly philosophically relevant, which is not the same as saying it has a definite philosophical thesis. What it does is throw in a mish-mash of symbols, allusions and questions which the viewer is expected to play around with. Certainly plenty of philosophers have had fun with the film, and it goes further than reference-spotting (e.g. the famous appearance of a copy of Baudrillard's "Simulacra and Simulations", which apparently was required reading for the cast).
no subject
Date: 2003-06-27 09:09 pm (UTC)"oh, love is the answer!" 23%
"wait, you mean its a matrix within a matrix within a matrix?" 47%
"so we thought we were in a matrix but we're actually only characters in a movie?" 35%
no subject
Date: 2003-06-28 03:52 am (UTC)