British politics
Saturday, March 16th, 2002 05:29 pmI've been out of the country so long, I don't really understand the politics any more. Can any of my British readers please tell me the difference between Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair (other than age, gender and sartorial preferences)?
no subject
Date: 2002-03-16 05:41 pm (UTC)I used to watch the British House of Commons merely for the comedic value. British politicians are way funnier than their American counterparts.
Or maybe it's just easier for me to find genuine humor in them since they're not my government.
no subject
Date: 2002-03-17 01:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-03-17 04:10 pm (UTC)Well, I know it seems paradoxical, but ...
Date: 2002-03-18 12:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-03-19 02:32 pm (UTC)My guess is that he supports every American military action because either (a) he has genuine principles which he is prepared to put into practice, no matter the cost (Solri suppresses a snort), or (b) he likes war. Of course, that's not always a bad thing (though it usually is). It was largely Blair who dragged the U.S. kicking and screaming into Kosovo, and if Blair had been Prime Minister instead of Major, the Serbs would never have got into Srebreniza (did I spell that right?). Major's only contribution to a "robust response" (as Blair would put it) was to give the SAS a nod and a wink to have fun in the forests outside Sarajevo (and he might not have even known about that, given the way the SAS operate).
BTW, I've just been reading John Locke's proposal to solve the problem of beggars. Looks like Tony might have read it too.
* Personally, I think affectionate diminutives should be earned. For me, the only Tony in politics is Benn.