Three Reasons Why Darwin Was Wrong
Friday, October 21st, 2005 12:27 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
robinturner1. Reproductive Behaviour of Mites
Atheists would have us believe that species evolve through "survival of the fittest", with individuals who are better adapted to their environment standing a better chance of mating and producing offspring. When you look at the behaviour of animals such as chimpanzees (the evolutionists' favourite species) you might be tricked into believing that. But consider the reproduction of Acarophenax tribolii, a species of mite. When a lady mite gets pregnant, she has fifteen little baby mites growing inside her, eating her body. Unlike feminazi pro-abortionists, she carries them to term, dying in the process. The result is one baby boy mite, and fourteen little girl mites. Just before birth, the male child mates with all fourteen of his sisters, then dies. Such a beautifully complex process could not possibly be the result of so-called natural selection; it speaks eloquently of Intelligent Design. OK, it would have to be a pretty sick intelligence, but it still lets us say "Nyeh nyeh" to Darwin!
2. George Bush
Another one in the eye for natural selection is George Bush. Evolution, we are told, proceeds through random mutations which once in a few million cases produce an animal better able to survive and reproduce. How then, do evolutionists explain the extraordinary resemblance of George Bush to a chimpanzee? It's no good saying that the famous "missing link" has now been found, since the timeline is totally out of whack! The chances of random mutations happening in such a way as to retrace their steps must be a squillion to one. The only reasonable explanation for the Bush anomaly is that God simply made him that way. Probably to punish someone.
3. Vampires
Evolutionists and other anti-religious types are notoriously fond of shows like Buffy the Vampire Slayer which promote belief in the occult, which is just another name for godless science. But boy, have we got a question for them! Vampires, as everyone knows, create more vampires by biting humans, then forcing the victim to drink the vampire's blood. So how did the first vampire get there, huh? How did a non-vampire evolve into a vampire? Punctured equilibrium?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
evolution
Date: 2005-10-20 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-20 10:18 pm (UTC)bahaha!
Re: evolution
Date: 2005-10-20 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-21 12:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-21 05:34 am (UTC)Excellent. Bwahahah.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-21 06:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-21 04:26 pm (UTC)You totally misunderstand the power of the CIA.
Do you think that mites did that before the CIA changed them to make them into broadcasting units controlling your mind and thoughts to make you vote for the child of satan?
Don't you realize that satan is a chimp, and that long time spent with his father, the arch deacon of the satanic cult that is the CIA, made george bush into a chimp/satanic/bush creature controlled by the mites which the CIA made to spread AIDS and mind control all over the world?
As for vampires, they were created by the Commies to spread immunity to AIDS. I thought everybody knew that...
no subject
Date: 2005-10-21 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-21 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
no subject
Date: 2005-10-22 09:06 am (UTC)Reproductive Behaviour of Mites
Date: 2006-03-27 10:28 pm (UTC)