Webby sites
Wednesday, April 12th, 2006 07:46 amI have just been browsing the “honorees” at the 2006 Webby Award site. I had to click on five links before I found a site that I thought showed good web design, which considering that the honorees are supposed to be the best 20% of the nominees is rather depressing.
A Journey to a New Land
This site from Simon Fraser University explaining how the first humans arrived in the Americas is not badly designed, but I still don’t think it merits an award. At first site it looks quite nice, with a broad graphic across the top showing a chilly landscape and a couple of haggard Paleo-Americans looking worn out by their journey across the land-bridge from Siberia. It makes you feel grateful for modern transport and skin-care products. On second glance, though, the navigation leaves much to be desired, or rather, there is too much navigation to be desirable. The first band across the top gives you a link to the same page you are already looking at (a common fault which I have committed myself on occasion). Then there is a thin band of links to choose the educational level you want your content in: primary level, elementary level, secondary level, post-secondary level or Francais. Below this, we have the afore-mentioned graphics, with three visual links to Quicktime movies superimposed. Then we have our main text area, with another menu on the left, and a choice of large or normal text on the right. At the bottom of the text, there is a helpful link saying “back to the top”, even though the whole page only extends half way down your screen. Finally, there is the standard band of links for credits. In short, there is more navigation than content, which is probably how our Paleo-Americans felt about Alaska.
Abort73
I’m trying not to be biased against this site on the grounds of its message. It purports to show the true, grisly face of abortion. Fortunately the embedded video took so long to stream that I didn’t see what horrors await women in abortion clinics, but the overall design was enough to give me an idea. Everything about it says “chaos”, and I don’t mean “chaos” as in “pretty fractal patterns”, I mean “chaos” as in “a bloody mess”. The whole page simply screams at you.
ASPCA
Nowehere near as bad as Abort73, but still full of clutter. Like the Simon Fraser site, this is OK, but I wouldn’t nominate it for an award, except possibly the Cute Puppy Graphic Award.
Ambient Interactive
This is the opposite of clutter. I have no idea who Ambient Interactive are, since the only things on the page are a logo saying “Ambient Interactive” and a link to download Macromedia Flash Player. Since I downloaded Flash a couple of weeks ago, I clicked on the logo. This opened a pop-up window (cleverly designed to bypass Firefox’s pop-up blocking) inviting me to download Macromedia Flash Player. And they wonder why 80% of web users dislike Flash.
AARP
This is the closest I’ve seen so far to something that might possibly get nominated for a design award, though I still think that would be generous. There is a similar profusion of links to the ASPCA site, but they manage to arrange them into some kind of order which is almost aesthetically pleasing. I’m still scratching my head about this one, since by rights the site ought to be a mess, but it doesn’t look like a mess, so I suppose they should get some credit for that.
A Journey to a New Land
This site from Simon Fraser University explaining how the first humans arrived in the Americas is not badly designed, but I still don’t think it merits an award. At first site it looks quite nice, with a broad graphic across the top showing a chilly landscape and a couple of haggard Paleo-Americans looking worn out by their journey across the land-bridge from Siberia. It makes you feel grateful for modern transport and skin-care products. On second glance, though, the navigation leaves much to be desired, or rather, there is too much navigation to be desirable. The first band across the top gives you a link to the same page you are already looking at (a common fault which I have committed myself on occasion). Then there is a thin band of links to choose the educational level you want your content in: primary level, elementary level, secondary level, post-secondary level or Francais. Below this, we have the afore-mentioned graphics, with three visual links to Quicktime movies superimposed. Then we have our main text area, with another menu on the left, and a choice of large or normal text on the right. At the bottom of the text, there is a helpful link saying “back to the top”, even though the whole page only extends half way down your screen. Finally, there is the standard band of links for credits. In short, there is more navigation than content, which is probably how our Paleo-Americans felt about Alaska.
Abort73
I’m trying not to be biased against this site on the grounds of its message. It purports to show the true, grisly face of abortion. Fortunately the embedded video took so long to stream that I didn’t see what horrors await women in abortion clinics, but the overall design was enough to give me an idea. Everything about it says “chaos”, and I don’t mean “chaos” as in “pretty fractal patterns”, I mean “chaos” as in “a bloody mess”. The whole page simply screams at you.
ASPCA
Nowehere near as bad as Abort73, but still full of clutter. Like the Simon Fraser site, this is OK, but I wouldn’t nominate it for an award, except possibly the Cute Puppy Graphic Award.
Ambient Interactive
This is the opposite of clutter. I have no idea who Ambient Interactive are, since the only things on the page are a logo saying “Ambient Interactive” and a link to download Macromedia Flash Player. Since I downloaded Flash a couple of weeks ago, I clicked on the logo. This opened a pop-up window (cleverly designed to bypass Firefox’s pop-up blocking) inviting me to download Macromedia Flash Player. And they wonder why 80% of web users dislike Flash.
AARP
This is the closest I’ve seen so far to something that might possibly get nominated for a design award, though I still think that would be generous. There is a similar profusion of links to the ASPCA site, but they manage to arrange them into some kind of order which is almost aesthetically pleasing. I’m still scratching my head about this one, since by rights the site ought to be a mess, but it doesn’t look like a mess, so I suppose they should get some credit for that.